Posted: 30 Sep 2013 | Author: Sue Adams | Filed under: Genealogy software and data | Tags: 50 Marriage Mondays, family history, genealogy |

How did I do?
I have achieved the publication of 50 marriages, 24 from Dad’s side and 26 from Mom’s side, listed in calendar order below. The seed was planted when I was obsessing about the word count for my Masters degree thesis, which was supposed to be up to 16,000 words. The total 50 Marriage Mondays word count comes to 30,788 ‘words’, but includes tables, captions and anything else WordPress blogging software thinks is a word.
Other objectives were:
Publish weekly
Close, I took a 4 week break between 25 March and 15 April, so these posts were published out of calendar order. One other post filled in a week when there was no marriage (30 July). The publishing calendar was invaluable. Now I need to make another one.
Cousin bait
Yes, some cousins made contact, but writing made me reconnect with people and make new contacts.
Putting the marriages into historical context and sharing a useful output.
I think I achieved this, do you?
Re-visiting my database, data verification, and properly recording sources.
Mixed progress. The database still needs work. I have found a lot of new information, but most has not been entered into the database. I have been re-evaluating my research procedures and developing ideas about what genealogical software should really do. Some material not included will be refined, expanded, and possibly submitted as a paper to FHISO.
- Stamp duty and authenticity of legal documents
- Citation and Verification or ‘Where the hell did I get this from?’
- Which Church? – Church and State Jurisdictions
- Hold the Front Page and 1960s Social Care of the Elderly
- Parish Register copies – Microfilm, Fiche, Transcripts, Abstracts and Indexes
- Parish Register Inconsistencies and Finding a lost website
- English Civil Registration Tools – FreeBMD, FamilySearch England Jurisdictions 1851, and A Vision of Britain
- Making the Connection between Civil Registration and Census Records
- A Wartime Wedding
- Of this parish – Residence requirements for marriage
- Online Search and Index Adventures with Ancestry and Findmypast
- Name change and Insurance
- Baptist Marriage and Birth records
- Civil Marriage and Witness Identification
- Is it George or Jack? Engagement photograph identification
- A Boxing Day Marriage by Licence
- Marriage Banns and Putting Faces to Names
- Now you see it, now you don’t – IGI and FamilySearch
- Following the Farmers – A Research Plan
- Representing Multiple Marriages and Crossing Connections
- Copies of Copies, Citation and Source Evaluation with FamilySearch
- Women in the Property Records of Clent Manor
- Common Surname Trouble – Adams in Birmingham
- Naming Patterns as Evidence of Kinship
- Vanishing Artifacts – the Gravestone and Silver Spoon
- Skipping Down the Generations – Ancestral Surname used as a Middle Name
- Marriage on Facebook and a Customised Chart
- The Girl Next Door? Local History, Maps and Back-to-Backs
- Evidence of Illiteracy among the Bargees of Britain’s Venice
- Who’s who? Digital Photo Annotation
- Non-conformist Marriage by an Authorised Person
- The Housekeeper, the Valet and Grand Connections
- GRO Index Discrepancy or Name Variations?
- 20th Century sources – Electoral rolls, Google Maps and Land Registry
- Picking up the Tailor’s Thread through Trade Directories
- Provenance of a Personal Collection – Archival Accession, Arrangement and Description
- Linking the Jeweller’s chain through Trade Directories
- Is a Rare Surname easy to find? Searching for Barrowclift with Ancestry and FindMyPast
- Keeping it in the Family?
- Religious Affiliation and Who’s the mom?
- Pieces of Evidence – Corroborating a Family Tale
- Wills and Location – Further Evidence supporting the Inherited Family History
- Engagement Evidence – The Diamond Ring
- The Wife’s Whisper – Indirect Evidence from the Manorial Court
- Postcard Correspondence with In-laws
- Housing and Economic Status
- Cousins and a Golden Wedding Anniversary
- Death, Divorce or Desertion?
- Isa and Charlie – Double Tragedy
- The School Master and Seed Cake
© Sue Adams 2013
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted: 24 Sep 2013 | Author: Sue Adams | Filed under: Analysis, Genealogy issues, Sue's family research | Tags: 50 Marriage Mondays, bargee, Barton, Birmingham, canal, education, Spencer |
Family folklore from my paternal grandparents stated that we descend from Bargees, people who lived and worked on canal boats. It has often been said that Birmingham has more canals than Venice. To this day, Birmingham is a hub of Britain’s canal and navigable waterways network. In the early industrial revolution, canals were the transport backbone. As an early industrial centre, Birmingham developed an extensive canal network between the 1760s and 1830s, with connections to countrywide destinations. The Grand Junction Railway the first rail line to serve Birmingham, linking with Liverpool and Manchester, opened in 1837. By the time of this marriage in 1874, canals were still an important part of the goods transport network, but were challenged by the rise of rail.

Marriage Certificate – Samuel Barton & Caroline Spencer
Bride: Caroline Spencer, aged 18
Groom: Samuel Barton, aged 21, Carter
Date: 5 April 1874
Location: Bishop Ryder church, Birmingham
Father of Bride: Edward Barton, Boatman
Father of Groom: John Spencer, Wood turner
Witnesses: John Cartwright, Mary Ann Barton
The occupation of the groom’s father, Edward Barton as a boatman supports the family story. Census, marriage and birth records show both Edward and Samuel worked as boatmen, but also did other jobs.
Year |
Edward’s occupation |
Samuel’s occupation |
1841 |
Labourer |
|
1851 |
Boatman |
|
1861 |
Labourer |
|
1871 |
Boatman |
Boatman |
1874 |
Boatman |
Carter |
1875 |
|
Carter |
1881 |
|
Barge boatman |
1891 |
|
Labourer |
1901 |
|
Coal carter |
1902 |
|
Carter |
1911 |
|
Coal carter |
Notice that signatures of Caroline Spencer, Samuel Barton and witnesses Mary Ann Barton (Samuel’s sister) and John Cartwright are all recorded as his or her mark X, indicating that these people could not write. The 1911 census return for Samuel and Caroline contains indirect evidence of their illiteracy, as the schedule was signed by their 19 year old son, Henry, rather than head of the household Samuel.
Name |
Birth Year |
Year recorded as Scholar |
Edward Barton’s children |
Samuel |
1854 |
– |
Mary Ann |
1856 |
– |
Edward |
1858 |
– |
James |
1860 |
1871 |
Hannah |
1865 |
1871 |
Ellen |
1870 |
1881 |
Samuel Barton’s children |
Mary A |
1875 |
1881 |
John |
1877 |
– |
James |
1880 |
1891 |
Louisa |
1882 |
1891 |
Jane |
1885 |
1891 |
Samuel |
1887 |
– |
Caroline |
1890 |
– |
Henry |
1894 |
– |
Ellen |
1895 |
– |
Unlike the 1871 Scottish census, English censuses do not directly record attendance at school. However, ‘Scholar’ commonly recorded in the occupation column for children of school age, might be an indicator of some education. Some of the children of Edward and Samuel Barton appear to have attended school after 1870. As the absence of ‘scholar’ could be due to accidental omission or error, it is not strong evidence of a lack of education.
The Elementary Education Act 1870 established local school boards which could enforce byelaws requiring children to attend school between the ages of 5 and 13, where there was a school within 3 miles of the child’s home. The school boards could raise funds from the rate payers, but still required fees from the parents. Poor parents who could not afford fees or loss of the children’s income may have tried to avoid the compulsion to attend school. Although the Bartons lived in back-to-back houses they were part of the canal boat community that distrusted officialdom. In response to public health concerns two acts requiring the registration of canal boats were enacted in 1877 and 1884. The legislation proved unenforceable and ineffective as Benjamin Browning, a Medical Officer of Health noted in 1879 due to
“the reluctance of the boatmen themselves to have registration effected, since their children are at once brought under the ken and domination of the School Board.”
© Sue Adams 2013
Like this:
Like Loading...
Posted: 18 Sep 2013 | Author: Sue Adams | Filed under: Analysis, Genealogy resources, Land and property, Research strategy, Sue's family research | Tags: 50 Marriage Mondays, Adams, Ashted, back-to-back houses, Barton, Duddeston, redevelopment, Trade directory |
On first examination it would be easy to assume that the subjects of this entry in the 50 Marriage Mondays series had met through being neighbours, possibly from childhood.

Marriage Certificate – Thomas Adams & Mary Ann Barton
Bride: Mary Ann Barton, of 1 Bk 89 Heneage str
Groom: Thomas Adams, of 2 Bk 89 Heneage str
Date: 29 March 1902
Location: St James Church, Ashted, Birmingham
Only a fragment of Heneage Street exists today, and none of the buildings along the street survive. The parish of Ashted lay within the Duddeston and Nechells redevelopment area, first proposed in 1937 due to the unsanitary state of the housing. Redevelopment commenced after World War II when the area had suffered bomb damage due to its proximity to industrial targets, including St James church, which was demolished around 1956.
So, can we locate the residences of Thomas and Mary Ann? A clue lies in the addresses. The abbreviation ‘Bk’ stands for back, indicating the houses 1 and 2 were situated behind the house numbered 89 that fronted onto Heneage Street. Behind the houses that lined the streets there were courts or yards serving several 2 or 3 story Back-to-Back or Tunnel-Back houses accessed by an alley or passage. Many such houses on Heneage Street had only 3 rooms. The houses of each courtyard shared outdoor toilet facilities and water pump. Birmingham Lives, The Carl Chinn Archive includes photographs of this type of housing, like Court 15 in nearby Adams Street.
The 1890 1:2,500 scale Ordnance Survey map shows Heneage Street stretched from Woodcock Street in the west to Great Francis Street in the east. It also shows the confusing jumble of courts. A larger scale map, (available at old-maps.co.uk, coordinates 408330, 287837) the 1: 500 Ordnance Survey Town Plan of Birmingham, dated 1887-1889, shows individual houses, but does not give house numbers. However, the 1903 street directory[1] makes it clear that the house numbers ran from 1 to ca. 150 along the south side starting at the Woodcock street end, and from 151 upwards along the north side starting at Great Francis Street. So number 89 was on the south side between Henry Street and Willis Street:
South side Heneage street
……… here is Henry st ………
Nicholls Harry, coal dealer
75 Smith Joseph, confectioner
81 Hayes Mrs. Elizh. shopkr
89 Heybeard Mrs. Dora, pawn-broker
90 Pearson Hy. painter & glazier
91 Hurst Mrs. Mary Ann, haberdasher
93 Avery Rowland G. grocer
97 { Gill Herbt. Edwd. chemist TOWN SUB-POST, M. O.O. & S. B
……… here is Willis st ………
Counting back from 97, the post office (marked in green) on the corner of Heneage and Willis streets, 89 is a house (marked in yellow) with a passage on both sides leading to courts 15 and 16 (marked in blue). Each court contained 3 back-to-back houses (marked in red).

Back-to-back houses behind 89 Heneage Street
The street directory does not list everyone who lived in the street, but only those prepared to pay for an entry, such as businesses. To answer the question of whether Thomas and Mary Ann met as neighbours, I turned to the 1901 census, taken a year before their marriage.
Neither Mary Ann nor Thomas lived in Heneage Street in 1901. Pawn broker Dora Heybeard is enumerated at no 89 and the Bagliss, Tebbett and Browning families are listed at 1, 2 and 3 houses in court 16. Court 15 is not identified in the address column, so I am not sure which census entries relate to those houses.
The most likely candidate on the 1901 for Mary Ann Barton, is a 26 year old pen grinder, enumerated as a boarder with the Kidner family at Court 23 house 1, Clifton Road, Aston. The address again gives the clue that the house was a back-to-back. I have not identified Thomas Adams on the census because there are several possible candidates. Both Mary Ann and Thomas had moved more than once prior to 1901 with their parents, but apparently left home by 1901. In 1901, Mary Ann’s parents and Thomas’ parents lived at 85 Adams Street, Aston and 5 Guthrie Street, Aston Manor respectively.
Year |
Mary Ann Barton’s address |
Thomas Adams’ address |
1871 |
N/A |
2 bk of 27 & 28, Barr Street, St Martin |
1875 |
35 Brewery Street, Duddeston |
N/A |
1881 |
60 Richard Street, Aston |
13 Upper Hockley Street, Upper Hockley Street, Birmingham All Saints |
1891 |
Court 2 House 4, Dartmouth Street, Aston |
Upper Hockley Street, Birmingham All Saints |
1901 |
Court 23 house 1, Clifton Road, Aston |
Not found |
It is clear that the Barton and Adams families moved around the poorer parts of Birmingham close to the city centre. They may have been even more mobile than suggested by the census records presented here. Several addresses indicate back-to-back houses. Investigating the area has helped me understand my great grandparent’s humble origins.
© Sue Adams 2013
[1] “UK, Midlands and Various UK Trade Directories, 1770-1941”, Birmingham, 1903 Kelly’s Directory of Birmingham, image nos 141-142. digital image. Ancestry (www.ancestry.co.uk : accessed 18 September 2013)
Like this:
Like Loading...