Claverley Property Document Analysis, Part 2: Semantic mark-up

In Claverley Property Document Analysis, Part 1: Transcript I introduced the manorial court records of a property transaction and presented a transcript of the court session introduction and the two cases that dealt with the legal processes. Now we have a readable copy, the next step is to extract the genealogical information. I set some homework for readers to check if they were getting all the information contained in the transcript. My answers are:

  1. How many people are mentioned? 12 plus Queen Victoria in a regnal date
  2. How many places are referred to? 7 particular locations are referred to, with differing accuracy: some very specifically e.g. a house, others within a farmstead, hamlet or town. Assuming Heathton and Sleathon are the same, there are 11 place names including names of jurisdictions like parish, manor and county.
  3. Who lived at Catstree? Samuel Nicholls and Sarah Ward Nicholls
  4. How many ‘facts’ (e.g. John Wilson was a Farmer on 25th April 1844) are contained in this transcript?  I came up with 88. You might have different ideas.  Read on.

When you, a human, read a piece of text, you recognise names, places, dates and relationships without much difficulty. A computer sees the transcript as a string of characters, mostly letters with a few numbers and punctuation marks. Before it can help you organise and analyse the information, you need to tell it what is a person’s name, a place name and so on. One method of doing this is semantic mark-up.

Tony Proctor of Parallax Viewpoint has been working on this problem for some time, so I challenged him to show me how he would code such mark-up. His blog post Claverley Property Document Transcript explains the internal representation giving detailed code. The non-technical will likely glaze over when confronted with computer code. I have to admit doing so with some of Tony’s earlier posts, but seeing it applied to my own example has greatly helped my understanding. He commented that a fully developed tool using this approach would look like a fancy word processor.

The court session introduction, marked up with semantic tags, colour coded as red for people’ s names, green for place names, blue for dates, orange for occupation/rank, manorial legalese in purple and property description shaded in grey, might look like this:

Claverley manor Court Baron Session

Claverley manor Court Baron Session

This is a basic level of coding, which could be refined further. For example, I have coded small places as pale green and larger places as darker green. Names could be similarly divided into forenames and surname, dates into day, month and year and so on. I did not code the reference to Queen Victoria as a person because this an integral part of a regnal date. Unlike the other people mentioned she played no part in the proceedings and might otherwise appear to be directly involved in nearly every legal matter!

So far, this mark-up does not include relationships or actions. These links are harder to represent visually, so I have resorted to using a table.

Person/ Event Relationship/ Action Object Relationship to date Date
A Manor existed at Claverley on 25th April 1844
Court Baron was held at Kings Arms on 25th April 1844
Court Baron was held in Claverley on 25th April 1844
Thomas Whitman was Lord of Claverley manor on 25th April 1844
John Crowther resided at Kings Arms on 25th April 1844
John Crowther resided in Claverley on 25th April 1844
Francis Harrison was deputy Steward on 25th April 1844
Christopher Gabert was a copyholder on 25th April 1844
Edward Crowther was a copyholder on 25th April 1844
Francis Harrison attended Claverley Court Baron on 25th April 1844
Christopher Gabert attended Claverley Court Baron on 25th April 1844
Edward Crowther attended Claverley Court Baron on 25th April 1844

Now the same treatment for the two cases:

Claverley manor Case x

Claverley manor Case x

Person/ Event Relationship/ Action Object Relationship to date Date
John Wilson attended Claverley Court Baron on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls attended Claverley Court Baron on 25th April 1844
John Wilson resided at Aston on 25th April 1844
John Wilson resided in Claverley manor on 25th April 1844
John Wilson was a Farmer on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls formerly resided at Catstree on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls formerly resided in Worfield parish on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls resided at Bridgnorth on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls resided in Salop county on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls was a Gentleman on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls was a Devisee in trust to John Felton on 25th April 1844
John Wilson was a Devisee in trust to John Felton on 25th April 1844
John Felton resided at Draycott before 25th April 1844
John Felton resided in Claverley manor before 25th April 1844
John Felton heretofore resided at Hopstone before 25th April 1844
John Felton was a Yeoman before 25th April 1844
John Felton died before 25th April 1844
John Felton was a copyholder before 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls paid three hundred and fifteen pounds seven shillings on or before 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls was a Spinster on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls paid to John Wilson and Samuel Nicholls on or before 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls purchased [property description] on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls resided at Catstree on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls resided in Worfield parish on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls resided in Salop county on 25th April 1844
[property] was called Mill Hill on 25th April 1844
[property] was in Sleathton township on 25th April 1844
[property] was in Salop county on 25th April 1844
[property] consisted of piece or parcel of land and all that newly erected messuage or dwelling house and outbuildings on the same piece of land or some  part thereof with the appurtenances on 25th April 1844
Grosvenors formerly owned [property description] before 25th April 1844
Onions previously owned [property description] before 25th April 1844
John Felton formerly occupied [property description] before 25th April 1844
William Ferrington occupied [property description] on 25th April 1844
[property] measured three acres one rood and sixteen perches or thereabouts being by computation the half of one third part of a nook of land on 25th April 1844
John Wilson surrendered [property description] to Lord of Claverley manor on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls surrendered [property description] to Lord of Claverley manor on 25th April 1844
John Wilson surrendered [property description] to the use of Sarah Ward Nicholls on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls surrendered [property description] to the use of Sarah Ward Nicholls on 25th April 1844
Claverley manor Case y

Claverley manor Case y

Person/ Event Relationship/ Action Object Relationship to date Date
Sarah Ward Nicholls resided at Catstree on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls resided in Worfield parish on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls resided in Salop county on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls was a Spinster on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls attended because of a surrender to her use on or before 25th April 1844
John Wilson surrendered [property] to the use of Sarah Ward Nicholls on or before 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls surrendered [property] to the use of Sarah Ward Nicholls on or before 25th April 1844
John Wilson resided at Aston on 25th April 1844
John Wilson resided in Claverley manor on 25th April 1844
John Wilson was a Farmer on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls resided at Catstree before 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls resided in Bridgnorth on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls resided in Salop county on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls was a Gentleman on 25th April 1844
John Wilson was a Devisee in trust to John Felton on 25th April 1844
Samuel Nicholls was a Devisee in trust to John Felton on 25th April 1844
John Felton formerly resided at Hopstone before 25th April 1844
John Felton resided at Draycott before 25th April 1844
John Felton resided in Claverley manor before 25th April 1844
John Felton was a Yeoman before 25th April 1844
John Felton was a copyholder before 25th April 1844
John Felton died before 25th April 1844
John Felton named devisees in trust in a will and testament before 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls desires to be admitted tenant to the Lord of this manor according to the custom of this manor of [property description] on 25th April 1844
Grosvenors formerly owned [property description] before 25th April 1844
Onions owned [property description] before 25th April 1844
[property] was called Mill Hill on 25th April 1844
[property] consisted of piece or parcel of land and all that newly erected messuage or dwelling house and outbuildings on the same piece of land or some part thereof with the appurtenances on 25th April 1844
[property] was situated in Heathton township on 25th April 1844
[property] was situated in Claverley manor on 25th April 1844
[property] was situated in Salop county on 25th April 1844
[property] measured three acres one rood and sixteen perches or thereabouts being by computation the half of one third part of a nook of land on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls was admitted tenant to [property description] on 25th April 1844
Lord of Claverley manor by his deputy Steward granted seizin for ever at the will of the Lord according to the custom of this manor by the rents and customary services therefore due and of right accustomed and for such estate and ingress[?] to Sarah Ward Nicholls on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls paid the Lord a fine of six pence half penny and four sixth parts of a farthing on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls was admitted tenant of Manor of Claverley on 25th April 1844
Sarah Ward Nicholls did fealty to the Lord on 25th April 1844

Traditional person based genealogy programs typically allow ‘facts’ to be entered for each person, but do not give easy access to events common to several people. The ‘facts’ typically have fields for the category, date, place and a general description. Some of the table entries above can be shoe-horned into that structure, but do not fit well.

Whilst it is useful to view all information about a person in a time line or other summary, I often want to know about several people at common place and time. For instance, the question “Who attended the Court Baron session of 25 April 1844?” can easily be extracted from the combined tables. I summarised the phrases “Came to this court” and “in his/her/their own proper person(s)” as “attended”. Court officials such as the deputy steward and homage (the two copyholders present as a jury) also clearly attended. In summarising the act of court attendance, I have taken one step of analysis. I am no longer dealing with a faithful copy like a transcript, but have started to interpret the document in the light of historical and legal context.

I found it hard to summarise legal jargon and the property description. Legal terms like “by the rod”, “heirs and assigns forever” and “granted seizin” convey information about the legal process and the type of land tenure.

Where there is a sequence of residence, occupation or ownership, I found it hard to express the relationship to the known date of the court session without including time information in both the 4th and 2nd columns. Also, the references to prior owners and occupiers included in the property description, may not be a complete sequence, and may refer hundreds of years back in time. These complexities are characteristic of this type of document. Other types of historical document have other characteristics.

There is repetition of entries in the tables, which reflects the original. Although the two cases are together in this example, they could be separated by months or even years. In an abstract of the transaction, it would be desirable to remove the duplication, but not in the underlying data.

So far, I have stuck to the information contained within just the record of one land transaction. By itself, it raises many questions and answers few. It is important to be able to track just what this record says without conflating it with information from elsewhere. So, we need to link back to the transcript and forward to other records.

Next time I will work on the locations mentioned.

© Sue Adams 2013


Claverley Property Document Analysis, Part 1: Transcript

An essential method of making sense of historical document is transcribing the original.  The Amanuensis Monday blogging prompt suggests transcribing documents is a good idea, because it:

  1. makes a copy
  2. transforms the original into searchable text
  3. forces focus on details

This is a start, but only hints at the processes involved.  A transcript is a faithful copy that preserves the characteristics of the original as much as possible, making a useful copy for further analysis and research.  The process of transforming an old hand-written document into a computerised one is not just a matter of typing the words.  Diplomatic (the study of documents) and palaeography (the study of hand-writing) skills are a great help in producing a good transcript.

The example I use here is a manorial court record of a property transaction.  The diplomatic study of this kind of record reveals their structure and the reasons why they follow a particular pattern.  The manorial court held sessions periodically at which various matters concerning the governance of the manor were presented.  Consequently the court recorded sessions and within each session one or more cases to dealt with each matter.  The court at Claverley typically presented the legal event of a surrender of a property to the lord of the manor as a one case, and the legal event of an admission of a tenant to a property as a separate case.  This reflected the legal technicality of copyhold property transfers where property always reverted to the lord of the manor before being granted to a new owner.

I have not included images of the original court books because I only have poor quality images and do not have any permission to reproduce the original.  These two related cases come from:
Manor of Claverley. Court Book 1833-1848. Session 25 April 1844. Family History Library, Salt Lake City, USA. film no 1951756.

Inevitably, some characteristics of the original do not translate easily into electronic text.  Description of the layout on the original pages, identification of my digital image files, and other explanatory comments are in square brackets.  Each line of text has been reproduced as on the original and line numbers added within each case.  I do this for difficult to read documents because it makes finding the place within the repeated phrases much easier.

[image P1284247.jpg]
[page number] (544)

[new court session starts half way down the page]
[in margin]
Manor of Claverley} to wit
25th April 1844

  1. The Court Baron purchased of Thomas Whitman
  2. Esquire Lord of this manor held at the dwelling house of
  3. John Crowther called the Kings Arms situate in Claverley
  4. within this manor on Thursdays the twenty fifth day of
  5. April in the year of our Lord One thousand eight hundred
  6. and forty four and in the seventh year of the reign of her
  7. present Majesty Queen Victoria  Before Francis Harrison deputy
  8. Steward there and in the presence of Christopher Gabert and
  9. Edward Crowther two copyholders of this manor.

[case 1 not transcribed as it does not concern people of interest]
[I photographed the start of the court session, then skipped to the cases of interest on a later page.]
[image P1284248.jpg]
[page number ?query not the page following the previous image.] (561)
[case x starting half way down page]

  1. To this Court come John Wilson of Aston within this
  2. manor Farmer and Samuel Nicholls late of Catstree in the
  3. parish of Worfield but now of Bridgnorth in the county of Salop
  4. Gentleman Devisees in trust named in the last will and testament
  5. of John Felton heretofore of Hopstone but late of Draycott within
  6. this manor Yeoman late copyholder of this manor deceased
  7. in their own proper persons and in consideration of the Sum
  8. of three hundred and fifteen pounds seven shillings of lawful
  9. British money to them the said John Wilson and Samuel Nicholls
  10. in hand well and truly paid by Sarah Ward Nicholls of
  11. Catstree aforesaid Spinster before the passing of this surrender
  12. as and for the purchase money for the hereditaments hereinafter
  13. mentioned surrender into the hands of the Lord of this manor
  14. by his deputy Steward aforesaid by the rod according to the custom
  15. [image P1284249.jpg]
    [page number] (562)

  16. of this manor All that piece or parcel of land called or known
  17. by the name of Mill Hill and all that newly erected messuage or
  18. dwelling house and outbuildings on the same piece of land or some
  19. part thereof with the appurtenances formerly Grosvenors and
  20. late Onions’s[?] situate in the township of Sleathton in the manor
  21. of Claverley in the county of Salop formerly in the occupation
  22. of John Felton and now of William Ferrington or his undertennants
  23. containing by admeasurement three acres one rood and sixteen
  24. perches or thereabouts being by computation the half of one
  25. third part of a nook of land  To the use and behoof of the
  26. said Sarah Ward Nicholls her heirs and assigns for ever at
  27. the will of the Lord according to the custom of this manor

[case y]
[undeciferable mark in margin]

  1. To this Court comes Sarah Ward Nicholls of Catstree in
  2. the parish of Worfield in the County of Salop Spinster in her own
  3. proper person and by virture of a surrender to her use at this
  4. Court made by John Wilson of Aston within this manor
  5. Farmer and Samuel Nicholls late of Catstree aforesaid but now
  6. of Bridgnorth in the said County of Salop Gentleman Devisees in
  7. trust named in the last will and testament of John Felton
  8. heretofore of Hopstone but late of Draycott within this manor
  9. Yeoman late a copyholder of this manor deceases desires to
  10. be admitted tenant to the Lord of this manor according to the
  11. custom of this manor of and to All that piece or parcel of land
  12. called or known by the name of Mill Hill and all that newly
  13. erected messuage or dwelling house and outbuildings on the same
  14. piece of land or some part thereof with the appurtenances formerly
  15. Grosvenors and late Onions’s situate in the township of Heathton
  16. in the manor of Claverley in the county of Salop formerly in the
  17. occupation of John Felton and now of William Ferrington or
  18. his undertenants containing by admeasurement three acres one
  19. rood and sixteen perches or thereabouts being by computation
  20. the half of one third part of a nook of land  To whom the
  21. Lord of this manor by his deputy Steward aforesaid by the
  22. rod according to the custom of this manor hath granted the
  23. premises aforesaid with the appurtenances and seizin thereof
  24. To have and to hold the same premises with the appurtenances
  25. unto the said Sarah Ward Nicholls her heirs and assigns
  26. To the use and behoof of the said Sarah Ward Nicholls her heirs
  27. [image P1284250.jpg]
    [page number] (563)

  28. and assigns for ever at the will of the Lord according to the
  29. custom of this manor by the rents and customary services
  30. therefore due and of right accustomed and for such estate and
  31. ingress[?] the said Sarah Ward Nicholls doth give to the Lord
  32. for a fine six pence half penny and four sixth parts of a
  33. farthing and she is admitted tenant thereof in form aforesaid
  34. and doth to the Lord fealty
  35. [signature]  Fran[cis] Harrison
  36. Deputy Steward of the said manor

[end of court session, another session follows]

Now we are ready to start analysing the information contained in this property transaction.  I will tackle extracting data in the next instalment.  If you fancy some homework, try answering the following:

  1. How many people are mentioned?
  2. How many places are referred to?
  3. Who lived at Catstree?
  4. How many ‘facts’ (e.g. John Wilson was a Farmer on 25th April 1844) are contained in this transcript?

© Sue Adams 2013