This week’s entry in the 50 Marriage Mondays series took place on a Saturday and the banns were read on Tuesdays.
Bride: Julia Ann Coulson, known as Jue
Groom: Albert Herbert William Proctor, known as Billy
Date: 2 January 1909
Location: All Saints church, Hitcham
Witnesses: Albert Walter Coulson, Lizzie Coulson
The Marriage Act 1753, commonly called Lord Hardwick’s Act stipulated that a marriage would be void if it had not been preceded by the reading of banns or the issue of a licence. Public notice of an intended marriage gave objectors the opportunity to make their case against it. The act further stated that the banns should be published on three consecutive Sundays. The banns for this marriage were published on the 6th, 13th and 20th October 1908, three consecutive Tuesdays. However, this would not invalidate the marriage. Although the law made publishing of banns mandatory, it only gave directives on the details of the procedure.
The Marriage Act 1823 simplified procedures, only requiring the parties to give their true names and abode to the clergyman, but introduced a time limit of three months after which banns would have to be republished. This marriage, solemnised 2 months and 27 days after the publication of the first bann, was just in time.
I do not have a wedding photograph of Jue and Billy, but do have some later photographs.
The witnesses, Albert Walter Coulson and Lizzie Coulson were siblings of Jue.
Photographs in collections of several family members feature people that have been identified as Jue, Billy and the two witnesses.
 Probert, Rebecca (2012) Marriage Laws for Genealogists. Takeaway: Kenilworth. p. 87.
© Sue Adams 2012
On first appearances, it is not obvious from the wedding photograph that this week’s entry in the 50 Marriage Mondays series occurred during World War II. The couple have been identified as:
Bride: Mabel Proctor
Groom: George Cobbold
Date: 30 October 1942
Despite the 1942 date, no-one in the wedding photo is in military uniform. This photo comes from my grand-mother’s collection. Another photo from the same collection depicts the Proctor family including 2 sons in uniform, clearly dates from World War II.
Notice that the mother of the bride, Julia Ann Proctor (nee Coulson) is wearing the same dress in both photos. This could suggest that the photos were taken around the same time, but clothes rationing during the war could have caused Julia to keep her dress for several years.
On checking the marriage index, I confirmed the marriage occurred in the October – December quarter of 1942 in the Gipping registration district and provides middle initials of M for Mabel and R for George. Although it is difficult to estimate the age of people based on a photo, George looks like he was aged between 20 and 40, so would most likely have been eligible for military conscription. The best fit in the birth index is for a George R Cobbold in January-March 1914 in the Cosford registration district, which would make George about 29. Possible reasons why George was not in uniform include personal choice, being in a reserved occupation, conscientious objection to military service, and health conditions.
Wondering which occupations were reserved but not having found a reliable reference online, I posted a question on the recently established Genealogy and Family History Q&A website on StackExchange. A prompt answer lead me to an article in The Times , and provided a reference at The National Archives (LAB25/97). The Times Digital Archive 1785-2006 is available through academic institutions and libraries.
George’s 1914 birth date is further confirmed by his October-December 1963 death index entry for a George R Cobbold (born ca 1914), in Samford registration district, combined with the National Probate Calendar entry
Cobbold George Robert of Straight Road Corner Battisford Suffolk died 12 October 1863 at Foxhall Hospital Ipswich Administration Ipswich 13 February to Mabel Maud Cobbold widow. £2765
 Service In War. The Times (London, England), Wednesday, Jan 25, 1939; pg. 6; Issue 48212.
This week’s post in the 50 Marriage Mondays series is another case of verifying what a relative told me some years ago.
Bride: Ivy Rose Proctor
Groom: Albert Palmer
Date: 21 October 1944
FreeBMD, which stands for Free Birth, Marriages and Deaths, provides an online searchable version of the General Register Office (GRO) Index of Civil Registration in England and Wales from 1837 to 1983. The ongoing project is run by volunteers and has now substantially completed transcription of the marriage index up to 1950.
The search page provides a number of search parameters, but for this example I entered the couple’s names and a data range from 1930 to 1950.
Strangely, my first search, where I entered the bride and groom the other way round, yielded no results. My second search gave one result.
It is always worth tweaking search terms and trying again as mistyping search terms and index errors can cause a search to fail. In this case it turns out that in the entry for Albert Palmer, the spouse’s surname was transcribed as Procter because it is not clear on the original.
The colour coding tells me that the registration quarter October-December 1944 has been fully transcribed, so this is the only possible match and is consistent with the information I already had. However, where is the Gipping registration district? Clicking on the link helpfully takes me to the information that Gipping registration district existed between 1935 -1974 and was comprised of the following parishes that were formerly part of Bosmere and Stow registration districts:
Akenham, Ashbocking, Ashfield, Badley, Barham, Barking, Battisford, Baylham, Bramford, Claydon, Coddenham, Creeting St. Mary, Crowfield, Debenham, Earl Stonham, Flowton, Framsden, Gosbeck, Great Blakenham, Great Bricett, Helmingham, Hemingstone, Henley, Little Blakenham, Little Stonham, Mickfield, Needham Market, Nettlestead, Offton, Pettaugh, Ringshall, Somersham, Stonham Aspall, Whitton, Willisham, and Winston.
Buxhall, Combs, Creeting St. Peter, Gipping, Great Finborough, Harleston, Haughley, Little Finborough, Old Newton with Dagworth, Onehouse, Shelland, Stowmarket, Stowupland, and Wetherden.
Ivy Proctor’s birthplace, Hitcham, is not in this list. How far is Hitcham from Gipping district? A map is the ideal tool to visualise relative locations.
England Jurisdictions 1851 and A Vision of Britain
Both these websites use Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technology to present maps of administrative units that existed in the past. FamilySearch’s England Jurisdictions 1851 is the more user-friendly implementation, but is limited by its focus on a particular time. A Vision of Britain is much more comprehensive and includes the history of a wide range of administrative units. As a product of a major academic project undertaken in the 1990s, the Great Britain Historical GIS, the website implementation is showing the age of its origin. The links to the boundary maps, and history of administrative units (important and useful to the genealogist) are not prominent. The boundary maps respond slowly, lack interactivity and support for pointing devices, and display only one administrative unit. Despite these limitations, it remains an invaluable tool.
From England Jurisdictions 1851 we can see that Hitcham lies in Cosford district which adjoined Bosmere and Stow. From A Vision of Britain, we can see which parts of Bosmere and Stow became Gipping district.
Knowing the administrative unit that handled the marriage registration gives us clues about where relevant records may now be held. I could simply order the marriage certificate from the GRO as a way of accessing the copy register submitted to the Registrar General. However, the two original registers are at:
- the Ipswich branch of Suffolk Record Office because Gipping district lies in East Suffolk
- the Stowmarket Registration Office