Is GEDCOM dead?
I picked up a copy of ‘Your Family Tree’ magazine today and found it contained an article entitled ‘Is GEDCOM dead?’ (June 2011 issue 104, p22-24), the same title as an article published in ‘Genealogical Computing’ in 2000 (available online http://www.ancestry.com/learn/library/article.aspx?article=4357). I have not come across the author, Richard Wentk before, so I Googled him. It seems that he has written articles for computing magazines published by future plc, the publishers of ‘Your Family Tree’, so he may be an in-house writer.
The article picks out five contenders for the development of a new standard: Better GEDCOM, OpenGen, an unnamed German project (www.genealogy.net), LDS church and GRAMPS. Of these, I would rate only Better GEDCOM and GRAMPS as contenders as they are clearly in active development. Gramps has been around for a few years now and I discovered Better GEDCOM in November 2010, shortly after it started.
Anything specifically related to software or standards development on the German website is not obvious, but having to translate from German did not encourage me to be persistent.
Although OpenGen was established in April 2010, their website contains no publicly viewable debate and the home page was last updated in 9 February 2011, so it seems moribund and the name a misnomer as it is an industry led endeavour. I found a couple of references to an unofficial announcement from FamilySearch (=LDS) of something called SORD (SOurce Record Data) at the RootsTech conference in February. It seems to me that there is still no real industry commitment.
I commend the publication of the article because raising the issue with the genealogy public is long overdue. I believe that the antiquated GEDCOM is holding back the Genealogy world, as it is the underlying cause of data transfer and other problems. An analysis of the search terms recorded for this blog suggests that 30% of queries are about this and related issues, which if representative, should be a big wake-up call for commercial developers of genealogy software.
1 Comment »
Leave a Reply
About Sue Adams
My interest in family history was ignited by the death of Raymond Coulson, a cousin of my paternal grand-mother. Tracking down the beneficiaries of his estate got me hooked and led me on to research the tales passed down the generations. The story continues …
-
Recent
- 75 years ago – Marriage of Thomas Adams and Mabel Coulson
- Three Wilson-Wilson marriages and the Family History Library Experience
- New Years Day Frolic – Walking the Bounds of Ancestral Land in Clent
- 101 Today – Mabel Coulson, birth certificate and photographic evidence
- Locating Clent manorial landholdings and SLIG
- Is GEDCOM dead?
- One lovely blog award
- Cartes de Visite album links to the Stanley family and Earls of Derby
- Illegal marriage plot thickens
- Data entombed in Family Tree Maker
- www.familyfolklore.co.uk – Feedback and Future Plans
- Illegal marriage and false address
-
Links
-
Archives
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (3)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
[...] Sue Adams found the “Is GEDCOM Dead?” article recently and was also frustrated with the lack of development, which speaks loudly as to what most of us family history folks are thinking. I commend the publication of the article because raising the issue with the genealogy public is long overdue. I believe that the antiquated GEDCOM is holding back the Genealogy world, as it is the underlying cause of data transfer and other problems. An analysis of the search terms recorded for this blog suggests that 30% of queries are about this and related issues, which if representative, should be a big wake-up call for commercial developers of genealogy software. [...]
Pingback by GEDCOM Standards: Is an Update Coming? | Family History | 16/06/2011 |